Jordanian opposition vows to keep up wave of protests, challenging kingdom's stability Associated Press/Fox News
Published
November 15, 2012
Is
Jordon next?
By RJ MacDonald
The
associated press reports that there are socioeconomic protests in
Jordan which protests are Islamist-led. This is very significant,
especially with the Muslim Brotherhood involved – a “spooky”
organization which has had historical dealings with Western
intelligence agencies such as MI6 and the CIA. This is a real
foreboding of things to come and it is still riding on the momentum
of the so-called “Arab Spring.”
Of
course the basis is economic in nature and the oligarchic government,
the kingdom that is, rather than absorbing the depreciation of it's
own economy, is seeking to let the people pay, so that it experiences
less loss – or no loss – itself.
Clearly
violence has erupted which means that the issues and the movement
which the issues have caused are very serious and will doubtfully
disappear soon.
Reportedly
the Muslim Brotherhood has stated that the protests will continue
until the government decision is revoked. It seems then that the
Brotherhood have taken a rather definitive and set position so that
the conditionality is instituted and so the pressure is on.
AP
reports:
"While
we understand the reasons behind the price hike, we insist it's a
temporary, but not a fundamental solution," said Jamil Abu-Bakr.
The alternative, he said, is a crackdown on corruption and a stronger
parliament to monitor the government's activities. He said a
demonstration is scheduled for Friday in Amman.”
The
fact that the frame of reference is a charge of “corruption” and
that the framed solution is to “monitor the government's
activities” indicates that the movement has taken a very proactive
and probably relentless mode of operation.
Cooking
and heating gas, the rising price of which seems to be what the
protests are centered around, can be seen as basic essentials and so
this will not simply be dismissed as a passing movement. Gas is an
energy issue, so no doubt at some level major energy corporations are
involved or will be in respect to a push-back in order to maintain or
even increase their profits. These are fundamental economic issues
then which are power based and therefor can give rise to violence
unfortunately, which violence may be used for the purpose of
implementing politico-economic change. A political “Kingdom”
combined with energy resources generates a fundamental equation that
the West, perhaps particularly the US, is and will be sensitive to
and may become involved in, if it is not already, such that they (the
US) may support a reactionary position behind the scenes, probably
initially in the mode of intelligence direction. The Muslim
Brotherhood is a double-edged sword for the West and the US,
depending on whether or not the Brotherhood supports the particular
Western hegemonic drives at hand. This may unfold in a rather
complex manner with variable contingencies determining, to a degree,
the unfolding of those events.
AP
states that:
“The
government has defended the price hikes, saying they are necessary to
reduce a massive budget deficit, part of Jordan's efforts to secure a
badly needed $2 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund to
shore up the kingdom's shaky finances.”
The
fact that the government wants to use the price hikes to counter a
massive budget deficit partly in order to secure a loan from the IMF
indicates that the West and more centrally the US is most probably
involved or will be, in supporting the government, unlike it's “Arab
Spring” role in respect to Syria. What this could do then is to
pit the Muslim Brotherhood against the US, which was not the case in
the “Arab Spring” as both had the common ground interest of
removing Bashier al Assad, that is unless the Brotherhood is used
covertly by the US to hijack and usurp the movement for the sake of
controlling and curbing the the critical dynamics. Again, what may
take place in Jordon will be quite complex and the basis of that is
that The Kingdom of Jordan has been a US alley to date.
“Jordan
has been hit by frequent, but small, anti-government protests over
the past 23 months, but these demonstrations have shifted the focus
from the government squarely to the king.”
If
it is true as AP reports that the focus has shifted from the
Jordanian government to the King then this indicates that the
movement is structural and therefor subject to deep fundamental
changes. If this is the case then there is little doubt that Western
intelligence will want to control the outcome in fear of the rise of
secular nationalism and a more governmentally controlled market which
might run counter to Western interests in the region.